In my opinion, there is nothing better than cooking outside in the backcountry. Nothing goes better with a good cup of coffee, sitting next to a flowing creek, listening to the sound of nature, and soaking in the majesty that is God’s country than a meal cooked afield. Cooking afield always tastes better no matter what is on the menu.
I have spent decades dialing in my cooking kits for different outings. What I bring canoeing is different from woods bumming, to hiking, and jeep camping- well don’t get me started. Through the years I have tried every kind of stove imaginable. A few years ago I found one stove, the folding Fire Box G2 Nano, that seems to always make my kit and travels with me daily. Due to the size and versatility of this stove it crosses over in all my adventures.
I have recently reviewed the Solo Stove and had many questions about the Solo. I found myself comparing the Solo to my Nano, I decided that I would let you guys in on my testing and thoughts on these two stoves. So without further adieu…
In the right corner weighing in at 6 oz, height 4.75 inches, width 3.0 inches, and folded a whopping .25 inches. The cost is $39.99 made from stainless steel made in the USA. Is the Fire Box G2 Folding Nano. I have the Titanium Folding Nano that cost $69.99 and weighs 4 ounces. Solo Stoves doesn’t offer a Titanium version.
In the left corner weighing in at 9 oz, Height of 3.8 inches, and a Width of 4.25 inches. The cost is $99.99 but is on sale for $69.99 made out of stainless steel. It is the Solo Stove Lite.
Are you ready to rummmmble?????
I wanted a good clean fight so we covered the rules:
It was a beautiful sunny day. The temperature was 72 with humidity at 53%. The wind speed was 0 mph, Barometer was 30.10 in/ Dew Point 54% with visibility was 10.0 miles. Just a great day to see a fight with awesome ring side seats!
I would use the same wood: 1.5 pounds of downed Pecan limb broken into twigs.
The prep for each stove was the same; 3 minutes of processing the wood into usable wood fuel. Both these stoves make it very easy to for wood collection and prep in not having to build the fire on the ground thus going no trace. Using downed material is a great time benefactor as you hike you can quickly gather needed materials…
Next I selected two 5 cup hard anodized aluminum Mors Pots. Below are the two stoves, fuel, and pots ready to begin the test.
I decided on 2 cups of water for the boil test. One freeze dried Mountain House requires 2 cups of water to rehydrate and cook.
So let the rumble begin. First I needed to load the stove. The Nano I loaded with the kindling on the bottom, added the pencil lead size, and followed by thumb size on the top. The Solo was done in the exact opposite with an upside down firelay. Once both were loaded I lit them, the Nano I just picked up and lit from the bottom and it fired right up. The Solo I lit from the top and I had to feed some more kindling to the stove before the fuel lit.
The Solo (above) took 4 minutes 16 seconds to begin the gasification process. Once that had begun I could add the pot.
The Nano (above left) immediately began burning and I was able to place the pot on the stand to begin heating the water.
As the two were burning I could feed the Nano from the bottom two offset holes or from the top all four sides. I could use any size twigs without concern in hindering the heat. The Solo can only be fed through the top into the one opening on the stand. I had to use very small twigs and I learned that you have to be careful of the amount of fuel placed into the Solo because more fuel reduces the gasification process and reduces the heat.
The boil time for the Nano was 7 minutes 53 seconds from lighting to boil not bad. The Solo came in at 8 minutes 53 seconds, however with the preheat which was 4 minutes 16 seconds, the total time was 13 minutes 9 seconds – still not bad.
Once they came to a boil I did not add any more twigs to the fire. I wanted to see the residual heat they would produce for simmering. The Nano went for another 11 minutes and 21 seconds before the water showed no more agitation of the water, so cooking rice, no problem. The Solo only simmered for another 3 minutes and 39 seconds before water showed no more agitation of the water, not so good for simmering.
Cool Down Time & Efficiency
So next was the cool down time of the two stoves, after all was done with cooking, time to get back on the trail. The Nano’s cool down time was quick enough to pack in 2 minutes and 58 seconds. I also noticed the leftover fuel in both the stoves was different. The Solo took 8 minutes and 4 seconds.
Looking at the burn efficiency of the two stoves is also important (see below). On the left are the remnants from the Nano, on the right from the Solo Stove.
The last thing I noticed was the amount of wood left over from the initial 24 ounces. The Nano burned half of the wood at 12 ounces, the Solo burned 14 ounces leaving 10 ounces on the table.
The last thing I tested was the packability. Side by side inside a 5 cup Mors Pot. Last one the two stoves stacked on top of one another.
The Solo does fit inside a pot, however it leaves no room for other items for storage in the same pot. The Nano allows ample room to store other items in the same pot. I carry my trangia and spices and coffee in the pot with my Nano.
So was it a knock out??? I will let you be the judge. All I will say is that the Nano G2 Fire Box is what is still in my kit. I will say the Solo Stove 900ml pot is what the Nano sits in. But that is another story, which will be told. Look for it soon.
Whether you pick one of these or another type of stove, all that really matters is that you GET OUT THERE!!!