The Jumping Off Place: The Relationship of Outdoor Skills and Camping to the Concept of Wilderness by Tom Ray

Recently I have been thinking about the connections among outdoor skills, camping and the concept of “wilderness.”  What are these connections and what do they mean for those of us that enjoy practicing a wide variety of outdoor skills (for lack of a better catch-all term), including Bushcraft, Woodsmanship, Woodcraft, or whatever they may be called?   Many of these skills are our shared outdoor heritage, handed down from a variety of sources, from native peoples to the “old masters” like Seton, Beard and Kephart.

Camp Toco, Kephart's fixed camp in the Smokies.

Camp Toco, Kephart’s fixed camp in the Smokies.  (Photo: Hunter Library, Western Carolina University, Cullowhee, NC)

These skills belong to anyone who puts in the blood, sweat and dirt time to learn them. They are no one’s exclusive property.  No one person or group can “own” these skillsets to the extent of excluding others who have learned skills contained within them. Once the skills are learned, if someone wants to use them in the wilderness, in a backyard, in a parking lot, or even to make money, then so be it.  Another point to be considered is that some of us have the idea that to practice these skills, and to “keep it real,” we have to be in the wilderness.   It is as if when these skills are not presented as being taught “in the wilderness” it somehow invalidates or cheapens the skills or information presented. The way that we view the concept of wilderness, the frontier ideal, the feelings it evokes, how it has evolved, and how it, as a part of our consciousness, continues to surface even today, is a very interesting subject. William Cronon’s excellent and thought-provoking essay, The Trouble With Wilderness, or Getting Back to the Wrong Nature, which I quote later in this article, is a must read for everyone still reading this.

Cronon’s essay is available here in its entirety

Cronon makes several important points in this work that are relevant to our discussion. One idea is that the attitude that Americans have today about the wilderness as something worthy of reverence and protection is a very recent development. Before the nineteenth century, the wilderness was a place of savagery, a place of banishment, an undesirable place that should be controlled and from which civilization should be wrested. But nineteenth century romantics like Wordsworth, Thoreau, and later Muir and Fredrick Jackson Turner, brought about a change in attitude with regard to the concept of wilderness and its connection to the “vanishing frontier” of the 1800’s.

“The removal of Indians to create an “uninhabited wilderness”-uninhabited as never before in the human history of the place -reminds us just how invented, just how constructed, the American wilderness really is. To return to my opening argument: there is nothing natural about the concept of wilderness. It is entirely a creation of the culture that holds it dear, a product of the very history it seeks to deny.” — The Trouble with Wilderness; or, Getting Back to the Wrong Nature by William Cronon

The whole idea that the frontier is vanishing and that what is left of it must be protected so that people can go out and prove themselves in the “wilderness” is an invention and vestige of nineteenth century romanticism that permeates our national psyche to this day. As proof, just look at the titles of television programs such as Man vs. Wild, Naked and Afraid, Survivor, Wild Alaska, Dual Survival, Mountain Men and the list goes on. This is not to say that parks and wilderness areas shouldn’t exist today-they should. Nevertheless, as Cronon implies, when people start to believe in this wilderness ideal, it is, in a way, self-defeating. The wilderness by definition is supposed to be devoid of people and their impact. If we go there, especially when a lot of us go (as we do in droves to our national parks), it’s not the wilderness anymore, and it is impossible to “leave no trace.” Most importantly, attitudes such as these indicate that we somehow believe we stand apart from nature, when in actuality, we are a part of it, whether it is in our own backyard or not. This kind of thinking leads people to burn large quantities of fossil fuel driving  hundreds of miles to the trailhead, only to camp within earshot of traffic noise, see hordes of other “wilderness” sojourners, or hear rangers tell them they should consider not coming on the weekend next time. It is the same attitude that prevails in the idea of “wilderness” survival-the idea that somehow, with ingenuity and a modicum of “modern” equipment, we can, incredibly, survive our own environment! Nature is everywhere, not just in the wilderness. This fact is the true embodiment of environmental responsibility.

My backyard practice area.

My backyard practice area.

What we sometimes fail to realize is that the sublime we so often seek in this wilderness ideal can be found in our own backyards or in other nearby places. Witness the following quote:

“Camping has no great popularity today because men have the idea that it is possible only after an expensive journey to the wilderness; and women that it is inconvenient, dirty, and dangerous. These are errors. They have arisen because camping as an art is not understood. When intelligently followed, camp life must take its place as a cheap and delightful way of living, as well as a mental and physical savior of those strained or broken by the grind of the overbusy world. The wilderness affords the ideal camping, but many of the benefits can be got by living in a tent on a town lot, a piazza, or even a housetop.”  — Ernest Thompson Seton, The Book of Woodcraft, 1912

A camp need not be in the wilderness for a camper to enjoy the outdoors. If the backyard is not remote enough, a fixed camp can be set up on a large tract of private land far out in the quiet of the country for a week or more. During this time, many of the same skills one would need in the wilderness can be put to use. Hunting, trapping, preservation of meat, fire and sheltercraft, properly pitching camp to weather storm conditions, camp cookery, manufacturing tools, making furniture and other endeavors connected with making one’s way in the outdoors can all be practiced.

A packable classic camp.  Kephart's tent is most likely ballon silk (Egyptian cotton).  (Photo: Hunter Library, Western Carolina University, Cullowhee, NC)

A packable classic camp. Kephart’s tent is most likely ballon silk (Egyptian cotton). (Photo: Hunter Library, Western Carolina University, Cullowhee, NC)

“When camp is made in a certain locality with no intention of  moving it until the party is ready to go home, it is usually called a “permanent camp.” This is a misuse of terms; for a camp of any kind is only a temporary biding place. “The camp and not the soil,” says Gibbon, “is the native country of the genuine Tartar.” When speaking of a camp fixed in one place for a considerable time I shall call it a “fixed camp.” It differs from a “shifting camp” in permitting more comforts of home.” — Horace Kephart, Camping and Woodcraft

Fixed camps with or without large canvas tents can be set up anywhere it is legal to do so and where one desires to partake of the benefits of life in the open. Fixed camps equipped with canvas wall tents may be set up miles from the nearest road. Once the trailhead is reached, roads, vehicles and parking lots are not required for the establishment of a fixed camp with canvas wall tent, awning and other basic comforts. Wall tents have been transported and pitched for hundreds of years by soldiers, miners, hunters and others making a living in wilderness areas lacking roads.

Kephart's first classroom in the Smokies.  The fence was to keep wild hogs out.  The smaller canvas structure to the right was his pantry. (Photo: Hunter Library, Western Carolina University, Collowhee, NC)

Kephart’s first classroom in the Smokies. The fence was to keep wild hogs out. The smaller canvas structure to the right was his pantry. (Photo: Hunter Library, Western Carolina University, Collowhee, NC)

Take out the hunting and trapping and the same skills can be utilized in many backyards. It is not necessary to go to the wilderness to pitch a tent, cook outside without utensils, start a fire without matches or practice many other outdoor skills.

Another very important point that I think is often missed is that no matter what one calls these outdoor skills, Woodcraft, Woodsmanship and Bushcraft are not styles of camping, they are sets of skills. Car camping, backpacking, canoe camping and Classic Camping and its variations are types of camping, not skillsets. Skillsets represent specific knowledge or information. Both Mears and Kochanski allude to this fact in the beginning of their books. For example, from what I have seen, those who use the skillset most would call Bushcraft are practicing a type of camping I would call backpacking or canoe camping. Classic Campers mainly tap into Woodcraft as practiced by Horace Kephart and Dan Beard, with a bit of modern technology, like how to use a Primus, thrown in. A day trip is simply a hike, canoe trip or what have you, rather than a type of camping, but its not a skillset. This is one of the main places where people are getting hung up in discussions on the Internet and unnecessarily coming into conflict. The skillset you use and the kind of camping you do are two different things. No matter what you call it, the skillset is not the kind of camping that you do. The kind of camping you do determines the skills you need. Some of these skills overlap and appear in several skillsets. An example is sharpening. It doesn’t matter what kind of camper you are, sharpening is a skill you need. It fits into the skillsets of Bushcraft, Woodcraft, Woodsmanship or whatever you want to call it. It’s the same with laying a fire or using a kerosene stove.

View from bed.  Winter 2013.

View from bed. Winter 2013.

Sometimes I go out to the country and go camping, not to consciously practice skills, but just to enjoy the peace and quiet. I call this Woods Loafing-or as my friend and fellow woods bum Wayne Williams calls it, “loafering around.”  If I had to depend on being able to go to an actual wilderness to go camping, I would be in trouble. I don’t have the finances or time to mount a wilderness excursion, not even once a year. By wilderness, I am not speaking of National Parks, National Forests or preserves of any kind, or of anywhere in the Eastern US, as by definition, these could hardly be considered true wilderness the way that certain parts of Alaska and Canada can. I enjoy many kinds of camping, and have done my share in parks and wilderness areas, but these days what I enjoy most is Classic Camping on private land, moving my gear by car or canoe. I like camping on private land because it offers security, privacy and the freedom to do what I want within the confines of good stewardship. I don’t have to worry as much about running into ne’er do wells on the trail, leaving my gear unattended while I hike, being seen while answering the call of nature, cutting a tree or two, gumming a rabbit for a stew or a host of other concerns I would worry about in a designated “wilderness area” in the eastern US.

My first trapper cabin, 14 years old.  (Photo: Merritt R Wentz)

My first trapper cabin, 14 years old. (Photo: Merritt R Wentz)

I have a friend named John who has camped in various places around the world. He even lived with natives in the South Seas for a while. John is famously known as the “Backyard Camper” because he once pitched his canvas wall tent in his backyard and left it set up for a year, sleeping in it every night he could and practicing his skills. Knowing John, it was more often than not that he spent the night out there. Think of what John learned during that year and how many times he got to camp! The sublime is right under our noses. Enjoy nature and practicing your skills and sharing them with others, wherever you are, whatever those skills may be. It is a great thing if some of them are, but you needn’t worry if all your camping trips aren’t to the “wilderness.”

“A person with a clear heart and open mind can experience the wilderness anywhere on earth. It is a quality of one’s own consciousness. The planet is a wild place and always will be.”  — Gary Snyder, quoted from The Trouble with Wilderness; or, Getting Back to the Wrong Nature by William Cronon

For further reading, please read The Practice of the Wild, by Gary Snyder. Steve Watts turned me on to this book. It comes highly recommended by both of us.

Author Biography:

Tom Ray, 53, grew up on a small farm near Lockhart, South Carolina. His youth was spent hunting, fishing, camping and trapping in and around the Broad River Basin and Sumter National Forest. As a result, he developed a lifelong interest in history, aboriginal studies, survival, primitive arts and frontier life. Early teachers were his older brother James and his Uncle, Grover Pinkney “Pink” Scott. For the last sixteen years, he has studied with Steve Watts at the Schiele Museum of Natural History. Another very important teacher is Errett Callahan. Other teachers and influences include David Wescott, Mel Deweese, Mors Kochanski and Dave Holladay. For the past 28 years, Tom has worked in private, public and technology education.  He has taught numerous primitive skills classes and has presented a multitude of interpretive programs to a wide audience. His works have been published in the Bulletin of Primitive Technology and on He and his wife Claudia reside in Rock Hill, SC.

Tom Ray (center) with Mors Kochanski (left) and David Wescott at Woodsmoke 2012

Tom Ray (center) with Mors Kochanski (left) and David Wescott at Woodsmoke 2012


5 Responses to The Jumping Off Place: The Relationship of Outdoor Skills and Camping to the Concept of Wilderness by Tom Ray

    Ross Gilmore July 23, 2013 at 7:51 am #

    Interesting concept. All the philosophizing aside though, I strongly disagree that being in the wilderness is a state of mind, and judging by the article, neither does the author, despite his assertions. He makes some very clear distinctions between “real” and “not real” wilderness, which would not exist if it was just a state of mind and all around us.

    We can play with dictionary definitions all we want, but even the youngest boy scout can tell you the difference between being in the backyard and being in the actual woods. As much as we want to make ourselves feel like we are just as much of a woodsman by camping in the backyard, it is not the same as actually being in the woods or the wilderness (the common sense definition of wilderness, not the philosophical “it’s all around us” definition). Similarly, doing the exact same skills in the backyard is in no way the same as doing it after you have carried your gear for twenty miles into the woods. It’s just not; the same way as shooting at the rifle range is not the same as being in combat.

    I think the distinction between skills and activities is a good one. I think too often they get mixed up. Skills can be applicable to many different types of activities, and as the article points out, some activities favor different skills. That is not to say however that performing a particular task during different activities is the same or equally challenging. It is not. Having breakfast at home and then going into the backyard to build a shelter is quite different from building a shelter on your third day of traveling on foot through the woods, with the rain storm approaching.

    I think the article confuses the ability to enjoy camping, with being in the wilderness. The confusion seems intentional and reached through distortion of the common definition of wilderness into a philosophical variation of quantum mechanics. You can enjoy being in a tent anywhere. Being in the wilderness however requires you to actually be in the wilderness. No, the backyard is not the wilderness, nor is it when you are in sight of your car. You can still enjoy the experience, but that does not mean that you are in the wilderness. We can twist definitions as much as we like, but the facts will not change.

    I find articles like this one, and there have been a few from the same group of people, to be what I call “backyard camping apologetics”. They seem to be written by people who enjoy backyard and car camping, but somehow feel bad about it. All the articles focus on explaining, through serious mental gymnastics how camping in the backyard is just as much woodsmanship and requires as much skill (if not more) than actually going into the woods.

    I’m just not buying it. If that’s what you enjoy, then go do it and be happy. Stop trying to convince everyone that it is all the same. Anyone who has spent any time actually being in the woods, and is still willing to go there, can tell you the difference between being in the woods and being in the backyard… philosophical musings on the nature of “wilderness” aside.

    Tom Ray July 23, 2013 at 10:15 am #

    All good points. I was not trying to intentionally confuse anyone, and your comment about quantum mechanics is puzzling as it deals with things on a microscopic scale, but then, I am not a physicist so I’m lost there. I really appreciate your kind comments with regard to my discussion on skills, which was an important part of what I was trying to get across in this article. That means a lot coming from you, as I have a lot of respect for your work. I think you are missing the point I was getting at with regard to wilderness in the article, or maybe I didn’t do a very good job. The whole concept of wilderness and all of the things people believe about it in their minds is abstract. What the word means to us versus someone who grew up in LA and has never been anywhere else are day and night. What we call a wilderness was home to native people, so it wasn’t a wilderness to them. Its a way of separating ourselves from nature so we can spoil it and be ok with it at the same time. I am not saying it doesn’t exist. There is the literal definition and the one that we are discussing-two different things. Its just the images that that word conjours in people’s minds, especially those that don’t do what we do. I understand that part was heavy on philosophy, so we can agree to disagree there. As far as practicing skills, I totally concur with “applied”, but I try it and hone it in my backyard first. if it won’t work in the backyard, it won’t work in the wilderness. I hear what you are saying about rifle range vs. combat. I got my vehicle stuck on one of those country campouts recently. We were going to camp, but didn’t expect the snow we got. I got a fire going with flint and char no problem, because i had years of practice behind me, more at home than not at home. That was all that stood between us and a very uncomfortable night. Walking out would have taken too long to do us any good.Sorry this came across as just a justification for camping in the backyard. I like being outside anywhere, and I do practice there, but it is not the only camping I do. I don’t think i said the backyard and field experience were the same. I just said you can practice the skills in either place. You are discussing skill application in combat, skill you have hopefully learned by practicing on the range, otherwise you are compost. You are confusing knowledge level learning with applying that knowledge in the field once you learn it. I am not a “discovery” learner when it comes to my life. i want to learn the skill throughly before I test myself by taking it to the field and using it make-or break when I am tired, cold, hungry or maybe injured. We don’t pull out the how to swim book when we are drowning. You learn the stuff, take it to the field and then see if you really learned it. I stand by practicing in the back yard, but i agree with you, after practice, you have to play in a real game to validate your skills. i don’t feel guilty about camping in the backyard, so sorry again if this comes across as a justification. I have my share of field experience under my belt and still take it to the field. I do my practicing before the game on my home field, not at the state championship. As for the “group” you mention, i think some confusion may have arisen because we do educational programs and set up when we do this near parking areas so the public can see what we do and hopefully have some fun and learn a little about traditional skills. It’s not the only way we camp in the classic fashion or otherwise. We are all seasoned campers, hunters, former Outward Bound instructors, foresters, etc. We also camp modern in the field. This is not all we do. I really appreciate you getting the discussion started! I have a great deal of respect for your opinion and think a lot of you and the work that you are doing. I hope one day that we can practice some skills together or maybe even go on a trek.

    Ross Gilmore July 23, 2013 at 12:32 pm #

    See, when you are being this nice, it makes me feel bad for being so confrontational. 🙂

    Perhaps I completely misunderstood what you are saying, or perhaps I was viewing it through the lens of the previous classic camping articles you had posted.

    I imagine it could be the case that our perception of wilderness has been altered through time. Certainly our efforts to protect and conserve it are a modern concept, and so is the willingness to view ourselves as separate from it. I’m however not sure that Native Americans or other indigenous people did not have the same thoughts. I am not sure how they viewed the forest beyond the settlements they used. Perhaps they were just as afraid to venture there alone, and felt just as foreign and isolated from it. I doubt we will ever know for sure.

    As far as practicing skills, that goes without saying. They should be practiced in a safe environment. Same goes for testing equipment. My point is that it is not the same. Practice at home is good, but will be very different from performing that same task in the woods. I know numerous people who practice all day long, and then completely panic when it actually comes to spending a night in the woods.

    My ultimate point is that we are free to enjoy ourselves however we chose. There is nothing wrong with that, and no one should feel compelled to actually go into the woods/wilderness to experience the enjoyment they seek. However, as people who aspire to be woodsmen and seek to further the craft, it makes a big difference whether our camping trips are into the wilderness/woods or not. In terms of fun and enjoyment, a camping trip in the back yard is equal to one in the wilderness, but in terms of skills and experience required and a realistic evaluation thereof, they rank quite differently.

      Tom Ray July 25, 2013 at 6:20 am #

      Thanks so much for your kind words Ross. Confrontation can be good because It gets all the facts on the table. I have always agreed that practicing in the backyard is not the same as application of what you have learned in the field, so I’m with you on that. I guess it’s my semantics getting in the way again. When I say practice, I mean just that-practicing to learn the skill to begin with, which you can do in the back yard, your local park or wherever. Application of the skill then can occur in the field, in what I call “the woods”. As you well know, even more learning occurs there, but the success rate and additional learning in the field is ultimately much higher because you have practiced at home. More bang for your buck, so to speak. This actual field experience to me, is application, which is a completely different level of learning from the practicing I was discussing in the article. I think you and I think alike on this. I think we would also agree that if we are going to teach skills, practicing is necessary, but there is no substitute for actual field experience, and lots of it, where your back is against the wall to give you the training esential to make you a qualified teacher. Teaching without field experience would be like coaching without ever having played a game. Anyway, when I go to the field I call it going to “the woods”; i.e. large tracts of land along a river far out in the countryside, a state or national park, a government wilderness area, a preserve or a national forest. Except for some time spent in deserts out west in the 70’s, I don’t consider anything I do around here wilderness work. As mentioned earlier, in the lower 48, I don’t think there much true wilderness outside of the deserts-totally my opinion though. So therefore, I call it “the woods”. This doesn’t mean that you can’t get 20 miles from your vehicle and get some good applied field experience there though. There are plenty of places around here where there is potential to get into a situation. In one of my nearby government designated wilderness areas, Linville Gorge, North Carolina, SAR conducts an average of 50 to 60 rescues per year. In fact, we had one conducted there about two weeks ago. It is very rugged terrain and remote, with unpredictable weather and very easy to get lost in. Most of my woods time has been in North and South Carolina, so that’s a little of where I’m coming from there. In my humble opinion, the most important survival skill in this world is the building and maintenance of human relationships, so I appreciate your kindness and your honest assessment of this article. You have given me a lot to think about for next time. I’m not really much of a philosopher, so my next one might be a trip report or one on equipment. BTW, I really like all the work you have done with regard to axes, especially the videos. In fact, I just scored a USA Collins 2 1/4 pound head the other day. All the best, Tom

    Chad August 17, 2013 at 9:14 am #

    This is a great article Tom! Will we see you in Idaho?

    Warm Regards

Leave a Reply